Category Archives: Users

Phosphorus plant removal from European agricultural land

Phosphorus plant removal from European agricultural land

With the title “Phosphorus plant removal from European agricultural land” the researchers Panos Panagos, Anna Muntwyler, Leonidas Liakos, Pascual Borrelli, Irene Biavetti, Maria Bogoños and Emmanuel Lugato have published a more than interesting article in the “Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety”.

The interest of this the article lies in the fact that the authors evaluate the importance of phosphorus in the growth and development of plants within the new European framework “Farm To Fork” whose objectives are the significant reduction in the use of fertilizers.

Phosphorus is one of the most important nutrients for the growth and production of crops, and in excessive use it becomes a contaminant. It is clear that the European Commission has a handicap in reducing fertilizers and maintaining food security for Europeans.

The objective of this interesting research was to estimate the removal of P from soils by harvesting crops andeliminationof crop residues. Specifically, we attempted to estimate P removal taking into account production area and productivity rates of 37 crops for 220 regions of the European Union and the United Kingdom (41.5% of the planet’s surface).

And for this, the most extensive soil surface database in Europe was used (Land Use/Cover Area frame Survey ;LUCAS), and analysing the physical and chemical properties of 20,000 samples every three years.

And, personally, one of the most interesting contributions of this article, is that it makes a revision of the phosphorus cycle in the crop and the soil; as well as the importance of agricultural regions that we must know.

Available phosphorous in agricultural soils. Source: Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety

Conclusion

Again, when on the CONSOLE blog we recommend a scientific article, we recommend direct consultation. That’s Why, we will not disclose the results of the investigation. However, if we dare to point out that cereals and vegetables they are the crops with the highest P elimination rate; as opposed to fruit crops.

But, as we have just commented, there are regional differences, with the greatest P losses occurring in the northwestern regions of Europe as opposed to the Mediterranean regions and southeastern EU.

The value of the information presented by the researchers is that it allows the improvement in decision-making of the CAP policies in relation to the use of fertilizers.

Check the publication

You can read this article by clicking the button.
And do not forget that if you want to receive quality information you can sign up for our newsletter.

Internation Women's Day

International Women’s Day 2022

Today is International Women’s Day, and we want to celebrate it by congratulating and acknowledging the work of our female colleagues from the CONSOLE project.
These are 34 recognized women researchers who provide added value in the research that we are carrying out in this research project; as well as other scientific contributions.

For centuries, hundreds of brilliant women’s minds were silenced because of their gender (e.g., Mileva Marić, Marie Curie, Rita Levi-Montalcini, and so on). However, many of the great discoveries of science were and are their work. Despite the fact that discrimination against women wreaked havoc in all spheres, social, political, personal… One of the most discriminatory fields has been the scientific field.

We want to pay a small tribute with this gallery to all those scientific women who accompany us every day in the CONSOLE project, and without their contribution we would not have been able to achieve the objectives that we set at the beginning. We want to pay a small tribute with this gallery to all those scientific women who accompany us every day in the CONSOLE project, and without their contribution we would not have been able to achieve the objectives that we set at the beginning.

Thank you very much

Maira Dzelzkalēja-Burmistre
Maira Dzelzkalēja-Burmistre

Zemnieku Saeima (ZSA)

Zanda Melnalksne
Zanda Melnalksne

Zemnieku Saeima (ZSA)

Inga Bērziņa
Inga Bērziņa

Zemnieku Saeima (ZSA)

Ana Iglesias
Ana Iglesias

Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)

Isabel Bardají
Isabel Bardají

Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (UPM)

Meri Raggi
Meri Raggi

Alma Mater Studiorum – Università Di Bologna (UNIBO)

Nidhi Raina
Nidhi Raina

Alma Mater Studiorum – Università Di Bologna (UNIBO)

Silvia Russo
Silvia Russo

Alma Mater Studiorum – Università Di Bologna (UNIBO)

Thia Hennessy
Thia Hennessy

University College Cork – National University of Ireland (UCC)

Nynke Schulp
Nynke Schulp

Stichting VU (VUA)

Hélène Paillard
Hélène Paillard

Association TRAME

Agata Malak-Rawlikowska
Agata Malak-Rawlikowska

Szkoła Główna Gospodarstwa Wiejskiego w Warszawie SGGW

Emmi Haltia
Emmi Haltia

Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)

Oili Tarvainen
Oili Tarvainen

Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)

Katri Hamunen
Katri Hamunen

Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke)

Pippa Chapman
Pippa Chapman

University of Leeds (UoL)

Julia Martín-Ortega
Julia Martín-Ortega

University of Leeds (UoL)

Melanie Stonard
Melanie Stonard

University of Leeds (UoL)

Kristina Todorova
Kristina Todorova

Institute of Agricultural Economics (IAE)

Julia Martín-Ortega
Eleonora Medeot

Alma Mater Studiorum – Università Di Bologna (UNIBO)

Melanie Stonard
Micaela Cosgrove

European Landowners Organization (ELO)

María Anaya
María Anaya

EVENOR TECH S.L.

Marie – Alice Budniok
Marie – Alice Budniok

European Landowners Organization (ELO)

Ana Rocha
Ana Rocha

European Landowners Organization (ELO)

Marie – Christine Berger
Marie – Christine Berger

European Landowners Organization (ELO)

Alexandra Langlais
Alexandra Langlais

Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)

Lena Schaller
Lena Schaller

Universität für Bodenkultur (BOKU)

Theresa Eichhorn
Theresa Eichhorn

Universität für Bodenkultur (BOKU)

Pauline Panegos
Pauline Panegos

Assembly of European Regions producing Fruits, Vegetables and Ornamental Plants (AREFLH)

Laetitia Forget
Laetitia Forget

Assembly of European Regions producing Fruits, Vegetables and Ornamental Plants (AREFLH)

Eriselda Canaj
Eriselda Canaj


Assembly of European Regions producing Fruits, Vegetables and Ornamental Plants (AREFLH)

Tania Runge
Tania Runge

Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut

Elodie Letort
Elodie Letort


Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAe)

Sabine Treguer
Sabine Treguer


Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAe)

Alice Issanchou
Alice Issanchou

Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAe)

Fanny Le Gloux
Fanny Le Gloux


Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAe)

Nature value bargaining (Luonnonarvokauppa)

Nature value bargaining (Luonnonarvokauppa)

Summary

The “Nature value bargaining” was tested during METSO pilot programme 2002-2007. The aim was to operationalize markets for biodiversity and natural values. Forest owners received subsidy for making the contract. The subsidy level was based on both the biodiversity values of the stand and timber stock. In addition, forest owners’ goals affected their price demands, improving the cost efficiency of the system. After the pilot period, the instrument was abandoned and replaced with more traditional AES due to EU-level legislative reasons.

Objectives

The objective of nature value bargaining was to establish markets for the natural/biodiversity values of forests. In these markets, forest owners are active and voluntary participants who offer valuable areas from the forests they own (Gustafsson ja Nummi 2004). Owners are encouraged to provide natural values by making temporary contracts with authorities (Forestry Centre or Environmental Centre) and by receiving a subsidy for providing the nature values. Basically, private forests are thus rented/leased to state for providing natural values fort he predefined period.

Public Goods

Soil quality (and health)
Soil quality (and health)
(Farmland) biodiversity
(Farmland) biodiversity
Climate regulation - carbon storage
Climate regulation – carbon storage
Nature value bargaining (Luonnonarvokauppa)
Nature value bargaining (Luonnonarvokauppa)

Problem description

The voluntary instrument (being part of the planned METSO biodiversity protection program for Southern Finland) was developed as a response to increasing societal understanding that negative biodiversity development needs to be considered more seriously globally and nationally. In particular, it was considered as a solution to Southern Finland, which is dominated by family owned forests. In Southern Finland forests have been managed dominantly for timber production. In this situation, establishing large continuous protection areas was considered to be challenging. The development was also affected by the experiences gained in Natura 2000 process, where the top-down approach and poor informing of forest owners led to conflicts. As a whole, state authorities were active in driving and developing new and more acceptable solutions. However, the nature value bargaining was an innovation that was developed in regional level (South-Western part of Finland, Satakunta) and it was piloted when the instruments for the METSO programme were tested during the pilot phase 2002- 2007. After the pilot phase, the METSO programme was launched in 2008, but the nature value bargaining was not among the instruments anymore.

LIFE: Projects to improve the environment

LIFE: Projects to improve the environment

An investment of more than 110 million of euros is the latest approval of the European Commission in the projects of the LIFE program, the tool that has been in operation since 1992 to protect the care of the environment and the climate in the EU. The projects of this call contribute to the ecological recovery after the COVID-19 pandemic and support the objectives established in the European Green Deal

The projects approved on this occasion have been selected after a call for proposals that was made in 2020. Czechia, Cyprus, Denmark, Slovenia, Estonia, Finland, France, Latvia, Lithuania, the Netherlands and Poland are the eleven EU countries where these investments will be ‘injected’.

LIFE, an opportunity

The European Green Deal serves to provide direct support to projects across the EU and restores nature to entire regions and countries.

The integrated projects of the LIFE Program are one of the main tools to make the ecological transition a reality by introducing concrete changes in practice.

The LIFE Program is the European Union Program for the Environment and Climate Action for the period 2021 -2027 (It has co-financed more than 5 500 projects across the EU) and is one of the main contributors to the European Green, whose objective is:

  • to transform the EU into a fair and prosperous society, with a modern, resource-efficient and competitive economy, in which there is no net greenhouse gas emissions greenhouse in 2050 and in which economic growth is decoupled from resource use.
  • protect, conserve and enhance the natural capital of the EU, and protect the health and well-being of citizens from risks and impacts related to the environment and climate.

Conservation objectives

The projects chosen by the EU have certain objectives to meet. The first of these is a project in France that pursues nature conservation, introducing measures to halt and reverse the decline of biodiversity in the Grand East region by creating three pilot forest areas. A second project will mitigate the adverse effects of human activities that threaten Finland’s marine and coastal biodiversity and improve the management of the national network of marine protected areas.

In terms of air quality, a Polish project will use measures to improve the overall air quality in the Silesia region, which has one of the most polluted atmospheres in Europe, by replacing small domestic solid-fuel heating appliances with less polluting alternatives. 

With regard to waste prevention and resource recovery, in Cyprus, a project will aim to improve infrastructure and collection systems for recyclable and biodegradable waste. In Latvia, separate waste collection and reuse of municipal waste will be improved. For its part, in Denmark, a project will work on the prevention of waste and the creation of better regulations on waste. Slovenia will be the country where a project will seek to achieve a higher percentage of recycling of non-hazardous waste from construction and demolition, among other measures.

Forest conversion from coniferous to deciduous stands - an eco-account case

Forest conversion from coniferous to deciduous stands – an eco-account case

Summary

The main focus of this initiative is to increase the percentage of deciduous trees through reforestation, forest restructuring and a targeted promotion of native trees in view of enhanced species and habitat protection. Ecological forest conversion takes place in a damaged coniferous forest of 252 hectares in the municipality Krailling in Bavaria. A mainly subterranean industrial use is combined with the creation, upgrading and enlargement of important habitats for wild plants and animals. Thanks to the recognition of the enhancement activities on approximately 100 hectares as private eco account scheme, the forest conversion is eligible as anticipated offsetting measure. An entry into the land register at the moment when developers make use of the already implemented eco-accounts measures to offset impacts arising from their projects secures the long-term preservation of the forest. The creation of an oak and hornbeam forest associated with wild fruit is complemented by the creation of forest aisles and nutrient-poor grassland in-between the forest pieces.

Objectives

  • Biodiversity protection in the long run through:
  • development of a private eco-account in southern Germany that is by its surface one of the largest ones;
  • long-term preservation of a mosaic of forest pieces and nutrient-poor forest aisles;
  • compatibility of industrial use and high ecological value in one area.

Public Goods

Soil quality (and health)
Soil quality (and health)
(Farmland) biodiversity
(Farmland) biodiversity
Climate regulation - carbon storage
Climate regulation – carbon storage
Forest conversion from coniferous to deciduous stands - an eco-account case
Forest conversion from coniferous to deciduous stands – an eco-account case

Problem description

The hurricane “Niklas” caused severe damages in the forest on 31st March 2015. Bark beetles damaged the coniferous trees further. This was taken as an opportunity to schedule a large- scale forest conversion. No public funds are available as the forest is declared as a special area due to the industrial use with tank storage facilities in the underground. The idea to create an eco-account was born to enable the forest conversion in direction of the natural forest cover.

organic_farming

A remarkable increase in organic farming

Organic agriculture is a production system that, through the rational management of natural resources, without the use of chemical synthesis products, provides healthy and abundant food, maintains or increases soil fertility and biological diversity.

It must be recognized that its appearance and expansion through the spacious agricultural and It is the result of the individual action of farmers.

The Research Institute of Organic Agriculture (FiBL) and IFOAM – Organics International have published a report entitled “The World of Organic Agriculture Statistics and Emerging Trends 2022”; where they have collected and analysed data from different sources in order to know the status and evolution of organic agriculture in the world. The first thing that the publication tells us is that the surface of organic farming has followed the growing trend, reaching a new record for the year 2020.

Globally, in 2020 it was achieved that the1.6% of the world’s agricultural land were organic. The highest organic shares of total agricultural land, by region, were in Oceania (9.7 %) and in Europe (3.4 %; European Union: 9.2 %).

More than 74.9 million hectares of organic agricultural land were registered in 2020, in which are included areas under conversion. Regions with the largest areas of organic farmland were Oceania (35.9 million hectares, nearly half of the world’s organic farmland) and Europe (17.1 million hectares, 23 %); Latin America had 9.9 million hectares (13.3 %), followed by Asia (6.1 million hectares, 8.2 %); North America (3.7 million hectares, 5.0 %) and Africa (2.1 million hectares, %).

By countries, those more organic farmland of the worldwide were placed in Australia (35.7 million hectares), Argentina (4.5 million hectares) and Uruguay (2.7 million hectares)

What are the main crops?

This interesting report informs us that more than two-thirds of the 74.9 million hectares of organic farmland in 2020 were grassland (more than 50.8 million hectares). The area of ​​arable land (arable land with 13.1 million hectares and permanent crops with 5.2 million hectares) constituted 18.4 million hectares, which represented about a quarter of the organic agricultural land.

But if you want to know the crops by continent, we highlight recommend that you consult the documentation directly.

What main products are consumed in the EU?

At the end of 2020, 14.9 million hectares of agricultural land in the European Union (14.9 million hectares) were managed organically by almost 350,000 farmers. In the EU, 9.2 percent of agricultural land was organic. Of these, we can highlight to the countries with the largest organic agriculture areas were France (2.5 million hectares), Spain (2.4 million hectares) and Italy (2.1 million hectares).

Although the growth of the EU organic Agri-food market increased, imports of organic Agri-food products decreased slightly between 2019 and 2020. Nevertheless, in 2020, 2.79 million metric tons of organic Agri-food products were imported (1, 9 less than the 2.85 million MT imported in 2019).

Among these products, there was an increase in imports of organic tropical fruits and rice, which was offset by lower imports of other cereals, oil cakes and sugar. The ranking of top trading partners also changed, with China and Ukraine is losing their top spots to Ecuador and the Dominican Republic.

It is also worth noting that the main importing and consuming EU Member States in 2020 were the Netherlands, Germany and Belgium..

Hopeful data

There is no doubt that the data is encouraging and that the growing trend of organic farming spaces seems to continue to grow over the years; which is obviously due to the fact that users are increasingly demanding healthier foods for their families.

As we have seen in several case studies of the CONSOLE project, the contractual relationships between farmers, public administrations; as well as with private sectors, it will allow the promotion and growth of both sustainable products and rural torritories of EU (and also beyond aur boundaries).

And as an example, is the case of study “Carta del Mulino” where has introduced a value chain contract solution for farmers supplying in common wheat to the mark of the famous company of Barilla, must comply with ten rules (ISCC PLUS certification to preserve biodiversity, crop rotation, minimum percentage of area allocated to flowers, selection of specific varieties, certified seeds, no use of neonicotinoids, no use of glyphosate, batch segregation and traceability, batch storage. separated from other production, added value distributed throughout the supply chain)..

We will describe more case studies in the following publications.