Category Archives: Case Study

Forest Bank – a forest conservation program in Indiana and Virginia, US

Forest Bank – a forest conservation program in Indiana and Virginia, US

Summary

Private forest owners convey both land development and timber rights to a quasifinancial institution, Forest Bank, in exchange for guaranteed annual payments, the value of which is based on the landowner’s standing timber. The Forest Bank protects valuable habitats and harvests timber using environmentally sound methods. The bank recoups payments made to the landowners, plus an administration fee, through timber sales as prescribed in a management plan that has been accepted by both parties. The owner gets access to annual income without need to liquidate his/her forest assets and compromise conservation values.
The Forest Bank is based on market incentives and landowner preferences. The owner can choose between a fixed-term (30 yrs) and permanent (99 yrs) contract.

Objectives

  • Preservation of biodiversity (valuable habitats and species)
  • Ecologically sound forest management that yields reasonable economic return to landowners
  • Prevention of erosion and protection of water quality
  • Economic viability of local communities

Public Goods

Rural viability
Water viability
Climate regulation – carbon storage
Landscape and scenery
Soil quality (and health)
(Farmland) biodiversity
(Farmland) biodiversity
Resilience to natural hazards

Problem description

The Forest Bank scheme was developed in the late 1990s by The Nature Conservancy (TNC), the largest conservation organization in the United States. The motivation for the novel contract solution was that protection of forests was too slow because acquiring environmentally valuable areas from private landowners required significant amounts of capital that was not usually available for conservation purposes. Working the standard way – preserving nature and protecting biodiversity by buying smaller parcels of land – mostly resulted in fragmented conservation areas that had limited environmental impact; they were not suitable for many imperiled species that required larger natural habitats or for watershed management that required landscape level planning and actions. Theacquired lands were often also fairly disconnected from other natural lands. TNC experts recognized that conservation efforts should be redirected to account for limited amount of capital, landscape level requirements, and a new form of integration of economic and ecological objectives that accounts for landowner preferences and viability of local communities. They developed an innovative contract solution, Forest Bank, which i) addresses conservation priorities and local economic needs simultaneously, ii) requires less initial capital because it is based on leases and conservation easements and accounts for landowner preferences, and iii) enables operating at the scale of landscapes and watersheds. The arrangement was named Forest Bank since the underlying idea was that a trustworthy institution holds and manages the tracts of forestland “deposited” by many small holders, then pays these owners a guaranteed rate of return on the appraised value of their timber assets, much as a commercial bank pays interest to people on their savings deposits. The Forest Bank is only available in priority ecological and environmental areas. These are often adjacent to national or state forests and parks, or other existing conservation and recreational areas. An important goal of the Forest Bank program is to establish ecological buffer zones around these areas and ecological corridors between them.

Cooperative rice production in coastal wetlands in Southern Spain

Cooperative rice production in coastal wetlands in Southern Spain

Summary

A value-chain related contract solution, where rice with higher standards is produced (integrated production of selected varieties). In the case study, rice producers are associated and work together to produce rice in partial and full organic production of high standards.

Objectives

The contract between the rice producers and the association (Arrozua) leads to a higher provision of the following public goods:
− Landscape and scenery (preservation of managed wetland)
− Biodiversity: The Arrozua program requires a limitation of agro-chemicals
applied and maintenance of flooding to preserve biodiversity of migrating birds
from Africa to Europe,
− Rural viability and vitality (secure economic viability of the farmers in the
Doñana region through the sale of rice with fixed prices).

  1. Preserve coastal wetland and secure biodiversity conservation
  2. Secure economic viability of the farmers in the Donana region
  3. Secure high production standards according to consumer preferences.

Public Goods

Rural viability and vitality
Quality viability and vitality
Landscape and scenery
Cultural heritage
(Farmland) biodiversity
(Farmland) biodiversity
Resilience to natural hazards
Rice production integrated into the value chain by the Arrozua cooperative. Source: Arrozua cooperative, 2019

Problem description

The sustainability of rice production in coastal wetlands is jeopardised by four main threats: water scarcity, decrease in financial support from the CAP, competition for water to preserve biodiversity, and future climate projections.
Current policies are insufficient in response to these kinds of threats and concerns, since they do not consider collective action or time scale. Most local and regional actors are only concerned about the three first threats, and consider the need to deal with climate change as very low priority. In contrast, this last threat is the main focus of international actors.
The high degree of collaboration between producers could be sufficiently important to define new collective action policies and contract solutions to preserve biodiversity. It will be important to incorporate public opinion into the processes of developing contract solutions, since the public opinion is fundamental in the area of the case study.

Viticulture on steep slopes creates diversity in the Moselle valley

Case Study: Viticulture on steep slopes creates diversity in the Moselle valley

Summary

Measures promoting species diversity in viticulture on steep and extremely steep slopes have been developed in collaboration with winegrowers. At the same time these measures contribute to the preservation of the traditional cultural landscape along the river Moselle..

Objectives

The preservation and promotion of biodiversity by winegrowers in cultivated steep and extremely steep slopes stays in the foreground. This is done by:
• seeding wild plants for greening the interrows of vineyards and field borders
• establishment of floristic and faunistic hotspots
• clearance of shrubs of abandoned vineyards as well as safeguarding the attractive landscape for tourism of the Moselle valley.

Public Goods

Rural viability and vitality
Landscape and scenery
Recreational access
Viticulture on steep slopes creates diversity in the Moselle valley
Viticulture on steep slopes creates diversity in the Moselle valley

Problem description

The project has been initiated as a reaction to the loss of flora and fauna typical for the Moselle vineyards and the need of specific protection measures, especially for endemic species like the Apollo butterfly.

Conservation of grasslands and meadows of high natural value through support for local livelihoods

Case Study: Conservation of grasslands and meadows of high natural value through support for local livelihoods

Summary

The agri-environmental measures are maintaining pastures and meadows, by mowing in a timetable throughout the year and limited mowing, affecting endangered breeding birds, European ground squirrel and raptors (King Eagle and Long-legged buzzard).

Objectives

  • To protect the local biodiversity in the area: breeding birds, European ground squirrel and raptors.
  • To encourage the involvement of farmers into schemes for biodiversity conservation.

Public Goods

Rural viability and vitality
Landscape and scenery
(Farmland) biodiversity
(Farmland) biodiversity
Conservation of grasslands and meadows of high natural value through support for local livelihoods

Problem description

The main driving force for this project was the need to assess which agri- environmental measures can be suitable in High-nature value pastures, so that farmers would be motivated to initiate their implementation. The need comes from the fact that there is a seriously high risk of destruction of the habitats of important breeding birds and European ground squirrel with direct effect also on predatory birds. The most serious problem leading to the loss of valuable habitats is the gradual conversion of pastures and meadows into vineyards.

Case Study: Participation of private landowners to the ecological restoration of the Pond area Midden-Limburg through a close participation of private and public landowners and a triple E- approach in the 3watEr project.

Summary

10 private landowners set up a specific association OVML vzw (Ontwikkeling Vijvergebied Midden-Limburg vzw) for participating together to a Life+ project (3watEr project) and ensuring collective implementation on the basis of voluntary agreements by private parties and an integrated management plan.

Objectives

The Triple E Pond area M-L project aimed to conserve or restore the following species and habitats of Community importance in the Natura 2000 network site ‘Vijvergebied Midden-Limburg’ (‘Pond area M-L’): bittern (Botaurus stellaris); tree frog (Hyla arborea); ‘Oligotrophic waters…’ (3120), ‘Oligotrophic to mesotrophic standing waters…’ (3130), ‘Northern Atlantic wet heaths with Erica tetralix’ (4010) and European dry heaths (4030). The project aimed to secure the ongoing participation of private landowners and other stakeholders in habitat management, to establish a sustainable basis for the conservation of species and habitats by enhancing synergies between Ecology, Education and the local Economy (“triple E-approach”), to enhance public awareness of Natura 2000 and to demonstrate best practices for involving private landowners as partners in the management of Natura 2000 sites. Private contracts for implementation of the LIFE project; integrated nature management plan for the implementation of the nature management goals.

Public Goods

Recreational access /
improvements to physical
and mental health
Landscape and scenery
(Farmland) biodiversity
(Farmland) biodiversity
3watEr project.

Problem description

Private landowners were not structured to realize nature management projects, as this until 2014 was rather a monopoly of nature NGO’s in Flanders. As in the Midden-Limburg area, private landownership was crucial to realizing specific nature management objectives, 10 local landowners took the initiative to start a Life+ project with other stakeholders. For doing so they created a private association (OVML vzw) assuming a common partnership in the Life+ project as associated beneficiary of the project. Private contracts were signed between OVML vzw and each of the 10 landowners for the further implementation of the LIFE project, also through an integrated nature management plan.

Banner_ALMO

Case Study: ALMO – alpine oxen meat from Austria

Summary

Under the ALMO brand, a meat processing company, a foundation for animal welfare, and 400 farmers, organised in an association and managing alpine pastures around the Austrian Teichalm and Sommeralm, work together to produce and market alpine oxen with higher animal welfare standards.

Summary

  1. Marketing of oxen meat from alpine pastures in Austria
  2. Preservation of alpine/mountain pastures by grazing.
  3. Secure economic viability of the farmers in the Almenland region.
  4. Secure high animal health and welfare standards in oxen meat production.

Public Goods

Farm animal health and welfare
Landscape and scenery
Rural viability and vitality
ALMO landscape
ALMO landscape

Problem description

Due to the rapidly increasing motorization in agriculture, the ox has long since been replaced as a draft animal. The domestic demand for ox meat was not significant, so the only way out was to export the Alpine oxen via trading companies with subsidies, in some cases as far as North Africa. In 1988 the idea of founding a brand was born. The ox farmers wanted to produce quality oxen on their alpine pastures for the Austrian market.