Category Archives: Users

Environmental improvement across a whole catchment: Esk Valley

Environmental improvement across a whole catchment: Esk Valley

Summary

The network covers the whole catchment and 30% of the land area is farmed by Countryside Stewardship Facilitation Fund (CSFF) network members. A key focus is what can be done to improve water quality across the catchment, especially as it is a salmon and trout river and sediment in the water is a major factor in the lack of recruitment of juvenile migratory fish. Water quality is generally good across the catchment and of Good Ecological Status according to the Water Framework Directive. Many other additional environmental improvements have been added; sedimentation, nitrate and phosphate pollution due to the agricultural and farming activities in the area, and complement the main focus. For example wading birds benefit from the network tackling issues of water quality.

Objectives

  • Support for the Pearl Mussel and Salmon Recovery Project;
  • Improvements to water quality across the whole catchment by tackling sediment and pollution issues;
  • Maintenance and support for historic and traditional National Park landscapes and features;
  • Address disconnect between maintenance of the iconic traditional landscapes in the catchment and the systems designed to reward this;
  • Improving skills and understanding of issues and the measures to tackle them;

Public Goods

Water Qualiy
Water Quality
Landscape and scenery
Landscape and scenery
(Farmland) biodiversity
(Farmland) biodiversity
Soil quality (and health)
Soil quality (and health)
Cultural heritage
Cultural heritage
Rural viability and vitality
Rural viability and vitality
Environmental improvement across a whole catchment: Esk Valley
Environmental improvement across a whole catchment: Esk Valley

Problem description

There is a long history of action in the River Esk catchment seeking to improve its ecological status so that an iconic species previously found in the river such as the Freshwater Pearl Mussel and species such as salmon and migratory trout do not ultimately go extinct. As a salmon and trout river that has supported recreational fishing, previous action and funding has often focused at the economic level. The CSFF is focused on the environmental and ecological aspects of the catchment, specifically from the perspective of those farming and managing the land. The CSFF aims to support efforts by the Esk Pearl Mussel and Salmon Recovery Project to re-introduce the Pearl Mussel to bolster the remnants of the existing population, through improving the water quality in the river. For this iconic species ‘good’ is not good enough, pristine conditions are required. This needs collective action from farmers in both upper and lower reaches of the catchment to reduce pollution and sedimentation problems.

CAP_Anniversary

CAP’s 60th anniversary

In Europe, we are in luck because the Common Agriculture Policy (CAP) has turned 60 at a turbulent time for the Primary Sector due to the pandemic, the weather or the crisis in raw materials.

The CAP, which was born after the Second World War in order to ensure the supply of food and decent income for producers, reaches its 60th anniversary on the verge of extensive reform.

Six decades of lights and shadows, reflecting the evolution of Europe, with its agricultural modernization, on the positive side, but with pending issues such as profitability; the importance of female role; generational change or the balanced distribution of value between farmers, industry and supermarkets, and also degraded environments and climate change.

The CAP directs the actions of some ten million companies in the European Union and 22 million workers and has 387,000 million euros in the new budget until 2027.

A little history

Although there were previous steps, the CAP was born in 1962 in the founding states of the European common market (France, Germany, Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands and Luxembourg) and is now applied in 27 countries (after the departure of the United Kingdom). It was made after the food shortage after World War II, in order to rationalize production. Two decades later it changed, in the face of productive expansion and in 1984, in the face of surpluses, the then European Community approved measures to adjust supply to demand..

In 1992, the PAC was the object of what is considered the greatest reform, the so-called MacSharry, because the price premium policy was reoriented towards income support through direct payments. In addition, it is clearly oriented towards environmentalist agrarian policies.

In 2003, the European Union reformed the agrarian policy in order to introduce the current single payment “decoupled” from the quantity produced. At the moment, farmers and ranchers are governed by an extension of the 2013 reform, which included a “greening” or greening of payments, that from 2023 they will be greener.

The CAP culminated in 2021, which will be applied between 2023-2027, is the second most ambitious of its existence and establishesPlanesANDnational strategic ones, which implies more responsibility to the Governments.

Set of objectives for the Common Agricultural Policy.

  • to increase agricultural productivity by promoting technicalprogress and by ensuring the rationaldevelopmentofagriculturalproductionand the optimumutilizationofthefactors of production, in particular labor;
  • to ensure a fair standard of living for the agricultural community in particular by increasing the individual earnings of persons engaged in agriculture;
  • yo stabilize markets;
  • to ensure the availability of supplies;
  • to ensure that supplies reach consumers at reasonable prices.

Source: Henrik Zobbe

A website for the celebration

The European Commission has created a web portal to report on its recent sixty birthday, where you can enjoy information related to the CAP both past and most recently, with information on the leadership of our exports, as well as offering opinions on different stakeholders.

Top Farms Group – cooperation in the supply chain in

Top Farms Group – cooperation in the supply chain in the “Symbiotic Model”

Summary

Cooperation within the “Symbiotic Model” between the Top Farms Group as a leading entity and partner family farms generates synergy effects and is an example of co-operation in the integrated value chain.

So far cooperation is limited to cultivation of selected crops (mainly cereals and vegetables). Resources of the leading farm can be used in partner farms allowing to increase profitability and production efficiency. An access to know-how, technology, machinery services and the supply chain of the leading company gives a chance to
optimize production costs and increase incomes.
In the economic dimension, the leading farm – the Top Farms Group, contracts specific crops on partner farms, provides means of production (costs might be settled after the harvests), guarantees purchase prices and certainty of commercial transactions, ensures
collection and storage of crops, etc.
In terms of the technology, the leading farm provides desired varieties of crops as well as agronomic advises that support implementation of good agricultural practices including methods increasing soil fertility based on and the foundations of regenerative agriculture in particular. Top Farms, which is the largest producer of nonGMO soybean in Poland is actively promoting cultivation of this valuable crop. Depending on the needs, specialized services using state-of-the-art equipment might be provided.
In the social sphere, the leading farm supports local development. Different actions undertaken improve the quality of life of local residents and benefit natural environment. Building water reservoirs which, apart from their retention and recreational functions, are a habitat for many species of animals, may serve as an example. The leading farm cultivates the culture and traditions of agriculture, among others enlarging the system of windbreaks in the area of the Dezydery Chłapowski Park through planting new and caring for the existing strips of trees and shrubs that protect the fields from wind erosion.
Cooperation in the social dimension also means support and education of local children and adolescents – the creation of a training center, apprenticeships for students, an educational program for children, subsidies for local agricultural schools, which are used by the families of the hosts cooperating with Top Farms.
The leading farm also invests in infrastructure so that local partner farms can more effectively carry out the tasks entrusted to them. An additional aspect is the support of local cultural, sports and rehabilitation institutions, local administration units as well as places of worship.

Objectives

  • Integration within the supply chain (farmer – Top Farms – processor) and within the local community around educational, cultural and infrastructural needs;
  • Ensuring the profitability of smaller farms by enabling the implementation of the most advanced cultivation technologies, including the most suitable varieties of crop, and an access to large customers in the supply chain;
  • Protection of the environment by promoting and implementing solutions basedon the foundations of regenerative agriculture.
  • Supporting the local community in meeting educational, cultural and infrastructural needs.

Public Goods

(Farmland) biodiversity
(Farmland) biodiversity
Rural viability and vitality
Rural viability and vitality
Quality and security of products
Quality and security of products
Top Farms Group – cooperation in the supply chain in the „Symbiotic Model”
Top Farms Group – cooperation in the supply chain in the „Symbiotic Model”
Farmers as Custodian of a Territory

Farmers as Custodian of a Territory

Summary

This type of contract compensates farmers for external activities to their farm production.The contract type has changed over time. However, the structure remained constant, and it includes two main parts: a) a fixed amount (payment) per farm for monitoring a water basin, b) a variable amount to reduce flood risk (and other risks like for example, erosion). The payment is incrementally based on the risk and the action taken to prevent it.
The investigated contract solution is the second one, which was redesigned in accordance with farmers involved and the University of Pisa. The second contract solution reduced drastically the fixed components (previously 6000€) due to the shortage in the budget to compensate direct interventions in case of urgent actions required. The main novelties were the requirement of a monthly report containing the results of monitoring and indicating the most problematic area. In addition, after a weather alert, the farmers could signal the threat to water bodies using a dedicated Web App (IDRAMAP).

Objectives

  • Preservation of the good status of water bodies;
  • Maintenance of agricultural and forestry activities with the preservation of existing hydraulic structures;
  • Support execution of preventing investments to reduce pressure on water bodies;
  • Supporting farmer’s viability;
  • Improve the cost-effectiveness of water bodies management;
  • Increase the capability to observe the territory and increase positive attitude towards non-productive investments.

Public Goods

Resilience to natural hazards
Resilience to natural hazards
Landscape and scenery
Landscape and scenery
Water quantity keep functioning existing hydraulic infrastructure
Water quantity keep functioning existing hydraulic infrastructure
Rural viability and vitality
Rural viability and vitality
Farmers as Custodian of a Territory
Farmers as Custodian of a Territory

Problem description

The mountain area of the Tuscany region is exposed to floods and landslides. This situation has worsened due to the effects of climate change and land abandonment. The Mountain community was in charge of monitoring and avoid water management risks over a territory of 115,000 ha, which includes 1,500 km of water bodies.
One of the three Authorities in charge to manage water risks in mountain areas (the formers Mountain community of Serchio Valley, now converted in Union of Municipalities of Serchio Valley (UMC) took the initiative to face:
a) institutional change, due to enlarging of the operated area due to acquisition and merging of the previous institution in charge of water basins management (RIbs) with devolution of competences to UMC;
b) needs to improve the efficiency in the management of water bodies, to avoid flood and other damages;
c) needs to reduce pressure on the environment by trying to keep farmers on the farm in the marginal area of the Apennine, while putting emphasize on ecosystem services provided by agricultural activities (reduction of soil erosion in the mountain by continuing grazing or correct forest management; maintenance of existing hydraulic structures in the forestry and agricultural areas).

Expert Missions EU

The Commission seeks top-level experts to advise on EU missions

Today the European Commission launched a call for experts to join the five Mission Boards, with the function of advising on the implementation of the EU Missions. The five Mission Boards will have up to 15 independent senior experts for each Mission.

The main tasks of the Mission Boards will be to promote the EU Missions by raising awareness among citizens and advising on the actions of the Mission implementation plan. The Mission Boards resulting from this call will be based on the work of the Mission Boards of the first phase (in charge until December 2021).

The Mission Boards advise on the full implementation of the five EU Missions working on:

  • Adaptation to Climate Change
  • Cancer
  • Restore our ocean and waters
  • Climate neutral and smart cities
  • Land Agreement for Europe

What are EU missions?

EU missions are a new way of bringing concrete solutions to some of our biggest challenges. They have ambitious goals and will deliver concrete results by 2030.

The EU missions are a novelty of the Horizon Europe research and innovation program for the years 2021-2027.

They will have an impact by giving research and innovation a new role, combined with new forms of governance and collaboration, as well as engaging citizens.

Requirements

Each Mission Board will be made up of up to 15 high-level independent individuals with excellent experience in serving public authorities and citizens, and in combining public and/or private funding. By forming Mission Boards, the Commission seeks to create balanced teams with diverse profiles. These should cover various domains, such as business, public administration, science, culture, citizen participation and civil society organisations, from across Europe and beyond.

Mission Board members must have strategic analytical, thinking skills and show a deep commitment to the success of the Missions. The Missions Board must be able to devise, demonstrate, apply and improve solutions on the ground to implement the Missions.

Do you want to participate?

The deadline has been extended until February 7, 2022 at 12:00 CET. Applications are available at the following link:

HAMSTER – Collective AECM to restore habitats of the European Hamster in Alsace (France)

HAMSTER – Collective AECM to restore habitats of the European Hamster in Alsace (France)

Summary

The collective AECM Hamster_01 was introduced in 2014 in the territorial Agri- Environment-Climatic Plan (PAEC) “Great Hamster of Alsace” (“Grand Hamster d’Alsace”) to protect the European Hamster in Alsace. Hence, the contract solution aims at encouraging the provision of a public good (remarkable biodiversity) for which the supply is limited to a specific geographical area. Since its implementation, ten territories spread among 3 eligible static protected zones contracted the measure. It represents about 140 farmers and 3000 ha. In addition to farmers, this scheme also involves various key stakeholders: the association AFSAL acting as an intermediary and regulator and in charge of allocating the public financial support among farmers; the Chamber of Agriculture of Alsace; the French Agency for Biodiversity (OFB); the Departmental Directorates of Territories (DDT) of the Bas Rhin and Haut Rhin Departments. The collective payment is conditioned to the implementation of crops and agricultural practices in favour of the survival of the European hamster on at least the targeted percent of the agricultural land of the territory. The individual “burrow premium” is conditioned to the identification of at least one hamster burrow on the agricultural plot.

HAMSTER – Collective AECM to restore habitats of the European Hamster in Alsace (France)
HAMSTER – Collective AECM to restore habitats of the European Hamster in Alsace (France)

Objectives

  • Protect the habitats and populations of European hamster;
  • Maintain the good functioning of the entire ecosystem associated with the specie.

Public Goods

(Farmland) biodiversity
(Farmland) biodiversity
Cultural heritage
Cultural heritage
European Alsace Hamster
European Alsace Hamster

Problem description

Cricetus cricetus is an umbrella indicator specie contributing to agricultural soil quality.
In France, its presence is limited to a few municipalities in Alsace. Threatened by the development of maize cultivation and its reputation as an agricultural pest, it is classified in the list of endangered species and protected by the Habitats Directive since the early 1990s. Operations aiming at maintaining European Hamster populations were carried out since the late 1990s but failed to meet the objectives. Following a complaint submitted in 2006, the Court of Justice of the European Union convicted France in 2011 for its lack of effective protection. 2 individual agri-environmental measures supporting the implementation of crops and agricultural practices in favour of the European hamster were introduced during the 2007-2013 CAP programming period. However, the lack of spatial coordination of the operations limited their impact.
Therefore, the National Hunting and Wildlife Bureau (today part of the French Agency for Biodiversity) and the Chamber of Agriculture of Alsace took the initiative of proposing a collective agri-environment climate measure (AECM) in the territorial project of the 2014-2020 CAP programming period, in addition to 4 individual AECM. In order to encourage more farmers to get involved in this approach, an individual bonus designed as a “burrow premium” was introduced in 2018 to reward the land managers of the plots on which at least one European hamster burrow was identified.