Category Archives: Case Study

Organic wine in Rueda, Spain (Rueda)

Summary

One contract about provision of organic grapes; the initiative is connected to specific labels, advertised to the domestic and export markets, to enhance the image of the company. The overall target is to expand organic wine production in an emblematic area that influences greatly the Spanish wine market.

It is a value-chain related contract solution, where only grapes produced ecologically are bought by the winery Herederos del Marqués de Riscal, S.A (from now on, Riscal), to produce two selected varieties: MARQUÉS DE RISCAL ORGANIC and MARQUÉS DE RISCAL SAUVIGNON BLANC ORGANIC.
In the Rueda case study, grape producers are not associated, however, they are integrated into the value chain by complying to the winery standards and have periodic controls on quality and residues, and have a strict protocol of organic production of high standards.

Objectives

The contract between the grape producers and the winery (Riscal) leads to a higher provision of the following public goods:

  • Landscape and scenery (preservation of wineries);
  • Protection of endangered species of birds;
  • Rural viability and vitality (secure economic viability of the grapevine producers in Rueda region through the sale of grapes with a higher price than the non organic producers);
  • Secure high production standards according to consumer preferences.

Public Goods

(Farmland) biodiversity
(Farmland) biodiversity
Quality and security of products
Rural viability
and vitality
Landscape and scenary
Th production framework in tha case study. Source. A. Iglesias, 2020
Th production framework in tha case study. Source. A. Iglesias, 2020

Problem description

The Rueda case study is located in the Duero River basin in northern-central part of Spain, where it occupies an area of 280,000 ha and currently grapewine is grown in almost 15,000 ha. Rueda belongs to the Mediterranean Continental pedoclimatic zone. The Rueda region is one of the wine regions in Spain that is more profitable, but at the same time needs a lot of man work, so organic production is a clear alternative. Wine production in the area in Rueda, is challenged by four main threats: water scarcity, decrease in financial support from the CAP, frost and future climate projections. The sustainability of wine production in the area is dependent on organic production that is becoming more attractive to consumers and with very high demand for export. The Rueda region offers a great possibility for organic production since the limited summer rainfall guarantees low incidence of diseases, especially mildew, therefore if the crop is
adequately managed, does not require pesticides. Riscal is a leading company for innovation for organic production in technology and commercially. The producers also plant trees in the edges of the fields to comply with the greening measures of the CAP.

Organic farming for biodiversity

Organic farming for biodiversity

Summary

The initiative called “Farming for species diversity (Landwirtschaft für Artenvielfalt)” aims to increase the diversity of wild flora and fauna on organic farms. A result-oriented approach with participation of the value chain is pursued. In Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania the WWF Germany and the federation of organic farming named Biopark have started the initiative together with the retailer EDEKA. A new standard going beyond the requirements for the organic certification has been developed with scientific support.
The nature protection certification is based on a credit point system with a broad range of over 100 measures. Its central element is a catalogue of measures with credits allocated to each of them. Together with a specialised nature protection advisor, the participating farmers choose the measures that are the most suitable and can be best integrated into their agricultural production. Factsheets provide detailed information on the implementation of the measures, suitable locations and potential indicator species.
The whole farm with all its land and the surrounding landscape elements is eligible. If the farmer reaches a minimum of credit points, he gets a supplement for selected products (pork, beef, lamb, and potatoes). The farmer is compensated for his nature protection efforts through the higher priced premium organic product sold with a particular label. The consumers actively support species diversity by purchasing these products.

Objectives

  • Increase of the diversity of wild flora and fauna in agricultural landscapes;
  • Establish a nature protection certificate for organic farms;
  • Improve the market opportunities for selected organic products.

Public Goods

(Farmland) biodiversity
(Farmland) biodiversity
Quality and security of products
Rural viability
and vitality
Organic farming for biodiversity

Problem description

The starting point for this project was the observed decrease of the biological diversity on farmland and in agriculture landscapes. In principle organic farming provides an excellent basis for a high species diversity of wild animals and plants. But also in organic farming the increasing economic pressure leads to intensification and this goes along with negative effects on species diversity.

Organic honey from Stara Planina mountain sites

Organic honey from Stara Planina mountain sites

Summary

The contract is ongoing since 2015 and includes on one hand collective contract between the farmers, and on the other – a contract with the distributor of the honey – “Harmonica” (it is also the name of the brand for natural, eco-friendly products). It also has the features of a value-chain contract, given that the honey and honey products go from the farmers to the processor (a small processing plant for organic honey) and distributor (“Harmonica”).
The farmers within the organization are 30 at the moment and are situated in Southeastern and Northwest Bulgaria within the natural reserves of the Stara Planina Mountain. The honeybee products are distributed as high-quality, pesticide free and eco- friendly products with responsibility for the bees and the ecosystems. The contract terms doesn’t include specific amount of honey that should be delivered to Harmonica, but it is specified on a yearly basis. The payments are dependable on the type of honey and are between 6.50-11 euro per kilogram of processed honey.

Objectives

  • Conservation of biodiversity by producing honey in environmentally safe way in mountain sites
  • Popularization of Bulgarian honey and honey products with high quality and ecofriendly practices
  • Collective initiative for encouraging Bulgarian farmers to stay in business

Public Goods

(Farmland) biodiversity
(Farmland) biodiversity
Quality and security of products
Farm animal health and wellfare

Problem description

The Bulgarian honey is mainly targeted for export for other countries. The honey however is classified as one with very high qualities, but unfortunately the mass consumption (due to lower prices) is of foreign imported honey and honey products. Also, in the last several years the share of poisoned bees due to agricultural activities is rising, putting some pressure on their population and therefore on the ecosystem functioning. The goal of this collective action was to encourage the consumption of premium natural honey which has positive impact on the local biodiversity, security and quality of products, keeping beehives far from industrialized areas and those with high pesticide risks.

FLANDERS – Flemish Forest Group

Summary

Due to the fragmented nature of forest ownership, groups of private forest owners and managers (Forest Groups) have been established in Flanders (Belgium). These forest owner associations oversee voluntary co-operation between the large number of private forest owners and sometimes
public forest managers. Their objective is implementation of improved and more coherent forest management practices. The 11 active Forest Groups in Flanders cover the whole territory and have almost 13.000 members (about 13% of all forest owners). The interests of the owners contracting membership are vested in the coordinated management of their forest parcels and the professional expertise and service they receive from the Forest Group. This represents i.a. administrative support, coaching and technical support, organization of joint wood sales, voluntary participation to projects or the setting up of combined management plans.

Objectives

  • Realization of afforestation and activation of forest compensation
  • Development of profitable resilient forests;
  • Achievement of conservation objectives in Natura 2000 areas;
  • Management of fragmented forests;
  • Promotion of neighborhood and play forests;
  • Support of local production and processing of a climate-friendly raw material;
  • Support the livability of the local timber sector;
  • Ensuring support in Flanders for sustainable multifunctional forest management;
  • Appreciating private forest owners for their social commitment;
  • Support not only private forest management, but also public forest
  • management.

Public Goods

(Farmland) biodiversity
(Farmland) biodiversity
Recreational access / improvements to physical and mental health
Air quality
Landscape and scenery
Rural viability and viability
Soil quality
Resilience to natural hazards
Climate regulation – carbon storage
Cultural heritage

Problem description

Forest ownership in Flanders is very fragmented. Most forest owners often have very little knowledge of forest management and little trust in government handling as such. They do have faith in the Forest Groups. Within these Forest Groups, the aspects of trust and voluntary approach are predominant, giving the forest owner the necessary freedom of decision. They allow forest owners to incorporate the management of their forests in a larger project. Most owners are proud to be part of a process towards better forests. Many forest owners are also quite happy with the support they receive to manage the forests in a better way. In this sense, the Forest Groups act as promoters and facilitators of a global forest policy. Small forest owners, who have no obligation to produce a management plan, often have an ‘ad hoc’ management, using felling applications and permits. They are stimulated by the Forest Groups to participate in joint management plans.

Biodiversity monitoring with farmers

Biodiversity monitoring with farmers

Summary

About 700 farmers throughout Austria, as well as students from 14 agricultural and forestry schools are observing the diversity of plants and animals on their own meadows and pastures. The program “Farmers keep an eye on plants and animals!” is part of Austria’s program for rural development since the period 2007-13 and also in 2014-20.
The program stands for the annual monitoring and documentation of plants and animals, as well as for the willingness to care for and sustain the extensive grassland. The program is part of the education measures of the rural development program, with the aims to raise awareness, to build knowledge among farmers about biodiversity on their meadows as well as to inspire them for biodiversity monitoring. This helps to better understand the relationship between grassland management and the abundance of certain indicator species Regulations are not part of the program but only monitoring activities. Monitoring observations and management measures are reported on an online reporting portal.
Farmers are paid a compensation for their monitoring activities, if they take part in further measures of Austria’s Agri-Environmental-Program ÖPUL, namely CODE WF (€39/ha with a maximum of 3ha) or biological farming (lump sum of €57).

Objectives

  • Biodiversity monitoring, conservation and protection of extensive grasslands by farmers , monitoring of 200 plant and 50 animal species throughout Austria;
  • Awareness raising and knowledge about biodiversity among farmers via the observation and documentation of the development of plant and animal species and recognition of connections between management practices and abundance of certain species;
  • Environmental consciousness raising among farmers;
  • Citizen Science in order to gain knowledge about the effects of different land management practices.

Public Goods

(Farmland) biodiversity
(Farmland) biodiversity
Landscape and scenery
Biodiversity monitoring with farmers

Problem description

Since 1995, a huge number of farms within the framework of Austrian Agri- Environmental Program (ÖPUL) have adhered to the agreed management requirements of the nature conservation measure (WF) in the use of their species- rich meadows. However, it is assumed that only if farmers really understand why they are implementing certain management measures a long term effect will be the result. For nature conservation measures to work sustainably, more is needed
than incentive payments and contracts designed as simple as possible. The sole advise of ecologists is not enough to achieve long-term awareness. This is where the project sets in and tries to generate long-term understanding among farmers by counting and observing the abundance of animal and plant species themselves and setting them in relation to management.

Delivering multiple environmental benefits in the South Pennines

Summary

The network was initially set up by a farm advisor who had good contacts with farmers, local authorities and other large landowners. Land managers in this area have previously struggled to access funding because it is not located in a National Park or Area of Outstanding Natural Beauty which receive additional funding from the Government. This is further compounded by the small size of many of the farms which makes it hard for them to apply to certain farm support payment schemes.
A particular highlight of this network was working with a local council that had been allocated £2 million following the 2015 floods. The group worked to ensure £500k was allocated to an Agri-Environmental Scheme (AES) which the network developed and Calderdale Council oversees. The network has also worked with the Woodland Trust to enhance the woodland creation offer.

Objectives

  • Build an informed and cohesive, landscape scale, land management
  • Community
  • Increased woodland management and creation
  • Improved water quality and flood risk in the region
  • Improved grassland and moorland habitat connectivity
  • Development of non-government funding streams for the delivery of ecosystem services in land management
  • Addressing potential issues resulting from sub-optimal land management

Public Goods

Soil quality (and health)
Rural viability and vitality
Water quality
(Farmland) biodiversity
(Farmland) biodiversity
Cultural heritage
Landscape and scenery
Resilience to natural hazards
Delivering multiple environmental benefits in the South Pennines

Problem description

The South Pennines network includes areas of protected status including SSSIs, SACs and SPAs. However unlike many other CSFFs in the Yorkshire region it is not in a National Park so does not benefit from the additional Government funding that those areas receive.
Farming incomes in this area are built on a long history of mixed livelihoods, from weaving on hand looms to working in the mills during the industrial revolution. The requirement for farmers to supplement their income with out-of-farm activities continues, and can lead to sub-optimal land management. The CSFF strives for a
future free from the threat of financial constraints and is aiming for continued land stewardship not intensification of farming.